Why I’m Not Renewal
This past Shabbat at PSJC, I found myself during kiddush sitting with a lovely group of ladies and one gentleman talking about the week’s parsha. As things were breaking up one of the women began to ask me about myself. I started to talk a little about my synagogue trilemma (that I have three synagogues to which I am connected, and each has a different essential element of what I want in a shul and each has a different serious flaw) and how I love PSJC but I have philosophical and aesthetic objections to the triennial Torah-reading cycle employed there. The woman seemed somewhat taken aback. “Oh,” she said, “so you’re, like, really more Conservative, not Renewal.”
My turn to be a little taken aback, but I tried not to show it. We were in a Conservative shul, after all… why should I be Renewal and not Conservative? “Yeah, I’m Conservative. I’m pretty traditionalist.” Reflecting on that statement, I thought of Flatbush Jewish Center, the shul closest to my home, which is Conservative and non-egalitarian. They certainly do not consider me to be “traditionalist.”
I often find myself confronted with people who have seen one or two aspects of my personality and build from that a gestalt of Gella that may go in almost any direction… but in the Jewish world most often suggests that I fit within a Renewal framework. It is not entirely unreasonable that one would get this impression. I am socially extremely liberal, I have appreciation for eastern philosophy and practice, my theology might be described as “non-traditional,” I advocate for gender and orientation equality and am myself bisexual, I go to the woods, I sing, I read Sufi poetry, I see a chiropractor, I meditate in the morning. Taken together and exclusively, these are all elements that, common wisdom suggests, would point toward a left-leaning non-traditional or neo-traditional Jewish practice that might include introductory meditation, chanting, ecstatic dance, hugging and laying of hands, etc.
But that is not where I fall or where I fit. The Renewal movement is comprised in large part of people who have found the existing streams of Judaism in some way dissatisfying, not enough, moribund, as the wikipedia article on Jewish Renewal puts it. While there have certainly been times in my life when I felt somewhat dissatisfied with my Jewish practice, felt lonely in my philosophical and theological understanding of Judaism, I never felt that the Judaism that I was practicing was in itself lacking in what I felt a need for, what I felt stirring inside me. I stuck with my Movement, and have become an advocate for it.
One need not, I find, go outside of the tradition, or drastically revamp the tradition, in order to find spiritual satisfaction. While there is plenty of wisdom to be gained from studying and even adopting elements of eastern philosophy, I have never found these to be external to Judaism in the first place. In my post on Buddhism and Judaism I talk about how the concept of Buddha is not incompatible with, nor a replacement for, nor really external to the concept of God in Judaism. My understanding of this does not necessitate declaring myself a JuBu. The fact of my understanding of Buddhist philosophy as being at the core of my Jewish philosophy doesn’t qualify my Judaism. It doesn’t instill in my a need to go running and looking for ways to visibly incorporate non-traditional or non-Jewish elements into my religious practice.
My religious practice is pretty traditionalist Conservative. I have no problem with the creation of new rituals where there is a genuine need, such as for baby namings, batot mitzvah, and committment ceremonies. I rarely see a need for radical revamping of liturgy (adding imahot is not a radical departure in my opinion). I can find what I need within the Conservative framework because I know how to look, because I have learned enough about it to know that what I need is already there, whether everyone recognizes it or not. Others have not been as fortunate as I have been in their educational and shul experiences and I can understand the place from which people can feel that they have no recourse except to something self-consciously and unabashedly eclectic and non-traditional. But I also think that The Conservative Movement loses more members than we have to because we don’t know how to look in our own backyard, because new and different names for God are exciting and alluring and seem fresh and juicy compared with the stale old God you think you grew up with.
You can meditate in the morning and then daven shacharit. You can read the Tao Te Ching and understand it as underlying Derech Eretz. You don’t have to skip Musaf or abbreviate the Torah reading to have a spiritually fulfilling experience in shul. What makes Judaism come to life is always, and always has been, study and understanding our tradition… taking the practice as it is and reading it as it fits. That’s why I’m happy as a Conservative Jew. That’s why I don’t have to be renewal. Turn it over and over… Fihi Ma Fihi… everything is in it.
Posted in Judaism |
January 8th, 2007 at 6:54 am
As I sit here at the conference of Renewal rabbis, I sympathize with your delema (especially the strange comment at PSJC) while I have a broader sense of what Renewal is about.
First of all, clearly triennial cycle is well established in Conservative circles, even if it does have real shortcomings, and many Conservative Jews and congregations don’t go for it. But more important, from my point of view, is that Renewal is a complicated endeavor, deliberately non-denominational. Though there are many “pure” Renewal rabbis here, mostly grads of the Renewal program, there are also rabbis affiliated with Reform, Conservative, Reconstructionist, and even Orthodox movements. They are in some ways stretching beyond the confines, but still remaining within those movements.
Our teacher, Reb Zalman, has also over the last few years urged us to have our practice more rooted in the tradition. My sense is that, in some ways, you do belong within the vision of Renewal, but not the popular simplified version of it. I’m sure you would agree that most lay Conservative Jews don’t really understand what serious Conservative Judaism is either.
January 16th, 2007 at 5:48 am
Due to a server problem, some comments got deleted. I have them in records, so I’m reconstructing them.
Jeff said on Jan 8th:
as I look at what I wrote, I just want to add that it is not meant to push you into a box in which you are not comfortable. I was not saying, “You are Renewal and just don’t know it.” Chas v’shalom! only that Renewal is deeper and broader than the popular image.
January 16th, 2007 at 5:52 am
Due to a server problem, some comments got deleted. I have them in records, so I’m reconstructing them.
Azadi said on Jan 9th:
Point well taken Jeff… and while I agree that my Jewish vision, as it were, fits within the principles of the Renewal philosophy, there is a problem of intention vs. implementation. Getting right down to it, my theology is in many ways very Kaplanian, and I feel as though my approach to Judaism might have, at one point, matched pretty closely with a Reconstructionist view. But the Reconstructionist movement, as it has evolved, runs very much counter to my Jewish philosophy. I learned of Rav Zalman when I read The Jew In The Lotus years ago and was immediately intrigued by him and his philosophy and approach, and was initially rather excited by what I read about the Renewal vision. But I find my Judaism as much in the method, the practice, and the tradition as in the intention… and my real life experiences with Renewal per se has been that it lends itself to the “popular image” that I find, lets say, very much not to my taste.
I realize that similar criticism could be directed toward Conservative Judaism for the extent to which it perpetuates the “just in the middle” perception. The difference as I see it is that The Conservative Movement was created as a response to a fundamental philosophical split, where as I understand it, Renewal exists as a reaction to a perceived condition.
As I’m typing this, I am cognizant of the fact that you, being steeped as you are in Renewal Judaism, have a much more holistic view of the whole thing, and I may be assuming too much. My point is not so much about criticizing Renewal as that I do feel at home with the Conservative philosophy and do not see any reason not to work for it’s ongoing expression in the Movement without applying another label.
January 16th, 2007 at 5:53 am
Due to a server problem, some comments got deleted. I have them in records, so I’m reconstructing them.
Jeff said on Jan 12th:
When I started seriously spending time with Reb Zalman I was about your age, and I was not particularly unhappy with Conservative Judaism, though I was already attracted to the Havurah Movement.
When I would spend time, especially Shabbat, with Zalman, I would find some of his practices uncomfortable. They were not the way I would normally do things, but I found I was learning so much of value that I cut him some slack (If one can do that for a rebbe, even if he was refusing to be one in those days
) Then I would return to my normal practices. In time one influenced how I thought about the other.
Now I am in some ways more eclectic, but I like both more traditional services and more Creative/Renewal services, and when I lead services in more traditional places, I find ways to use “renewal” techniques in a traditional setting.
My point is not at all to suggest that you will, or should, follow my path. I think my point is that one can remain at center a Conservative Jew and learn deeply from Renewal, and also Reform, Orthodox, Reconstructionist, or whatever, if you find a good, profoud, teacher or good, profound things.